ISSN   1004-0595

CN  62-1224/O4

高级检索

Polach理论框架下高速轮轨大蠕滑黏着特性建模

Modeling of Wheel-rail Adhesion Behavior at Large Creepages Based on Polach Adhesion Theory

  • 摘要: 利用全尺寸轮轨滚动试验台,开展了水和防冻液介质下黏着试验,最高线速度为450 km/h,最大蠕滑率为30%,测定了蠕滑率增加和减小过程中的动态黏滑曲线,评估了几种典型Polach大蠕滑黏着特性建模方法并进行了部分改进,最终构建了适于高速和大蠕滑的轮轨黏着模型,该模型有望提升车辆动力学分析与牵引/制动控制中轮轨蠕滑力的计算精度. 试验结果表明:水和防冻液介质下均存在黏着恢复、滞回和波动等动态现象,其中黏着恢复极限(第二峰)对应的蠕滑率分别在10%~15%和15~20%以内,故建议实际牵引/制动控制时将最大蠕滑率限定在该值以内,可实现最大化利用轮轨黏着;水介质下增大蠕滑率有利于黏着恢复,且黏着恢复程度随速度增加而显著;防冻液介质下,速度<300 km/h时黏着恢复程度优于水介质,而速度≥400 km/h时黏着恢复现象忽略不计. 黏着建模方面:传统Polach模型无法反映上述动态现象,引入比耗散能等瞬时参量能有效模拟黏着恢复现象、部分模拟黏着滞回及波动现象;引入短时间累积耗散能后,原有方法会丧失波动特征,并导致黏滑曲线出现不连续突变. 为此,优化静摩擦系数-耗散能关系函数并简化模型结构以改进建模方法,实现了黏着恢复及滞回现象的有效模拟,且模拟曲线与实测动态黏滑曲线间的均方根误差较改进前降低了近25%.

     

    Abstract: Wheel-rail adhesion model serves as a key parameter for vehicle dynamics analysis and traction/braking control, directly determining the calculation precision of creep force in the wheel-rail interface. Although some adhesion models have been developed for adhesion behavior at large creepages, their validation is limited to speeds below 200 km/h, leaving high-speed applicability uncertain. This work first conducted adhesion tests using a full-scale wheel-rail rolling test rig under water and antifreeze lubrication conditions with speeds up to 450 km/h and creepages up to 30%. Dynamic creep curves during the increase and decrease of the creepage were measured and analyzed, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of several existing modeling methods for wheel-rail adhesion behavior at large creepages based on Polach adhesion theory. Some improvements to the modeling method were made, and wheel-rail adhesion models suitable for high speeds and large creepages were finally constructed. This model was expected to improve the calculation accuracy of wheel-rail creep forces in vehicle dynamics analysis and traction/braking control. Test results revealed significant dynamic phenomena, including the phenomena of adhesion recovery, hysteresis, and fluctuation, where the creepage corresponding to the limit of adhesion recovery (the second peak) was within 10%~15% and 15%~20%, respectively. This finding suggested that the maximum creepage should be controlled within this range during traction/braking control to achieve maximum utilization of wheel-rail adhesion. Under water lubrication conditions, increasing the creep rate was beneficial to adhesion recovery, and the degree of adhesion recovery increased significantly with increasing speed. Under antifreeze lubrication conditions, the degree of adhesion recovery was better than that under water lubrication conditions at speeds less than 300 km/h, while the adhesion recovery phenomenon could be neglected at speeds equal to 400 and 450 km/h. Regarding the modeling of adhesion behavior, the traditional Polach model failed to capture the above dynamic phenomena. After introducing instantaneous parameters such as specific dissipated energy, it was possible to effectively simulate the phenomenon of adhesion recovery, and partially simulate the phenomena of adhesion hysteresis and fluctuation. When the short-term cumulative dissipated energy was introduced, the existing model lost most of its fluctuation characteristics and leading to discontinuous mutations in the creep curve. Consequently, an improved modeling method was proposed by optimizing the relationship function between the static friction coefficient and the dissipated energy and simplifying the model structure. The model constructed in this way achieved better simulation for the phenomena of adhesion recovery and hysteresis. Moreover, the root-mean-square error between the simulated curves and the measured dynamic creep curves was reduced by nearly 25% compared with that before improvement. Notably, given the inherent discrepancies between laboratory settings and real-world operational environments, as well as the model’s remaining limitations in fully capturing dynamic fluctuation, caution is advised during the practical application of the model.

     

/

返回文章
返回