ISSN   1004-0595

CN  62-1224/O4

高级检索
孙远, 王大刚, 徐伟, 张德坤. 主缆索股与鞍座间动态接触与微滑移机理研究[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2023, 43(10): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023113
引用本文: 孙远, 王大刚, 徐伟, 张德坤. 主缆索股与鞍座间动态接触与微滑移机理研究[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2023, 43(10): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023113
SUN Yuan, WANG Dagang, XU Wei, ZHANG Dekun. Dynamic Contact and Microslip Mechanism between Main Cable Strand and Saddle[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2023, 43(10): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023113
Citation: SUN Yuan, WANG Dagang, XU Wei, ZHANG Dekun. Dynamic Contact and Microslip Mechanism between Main Cable Strand and Saddle[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2023, 43(10): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023113

主缆索股与鞍座间动态接触与微滑移机理研究

Dynamic Contact and Microslip Mechanism between Main Cable Strand and Saddle

  • 摘要: 在悬索桥的服役过程中,由于桥梁恒载、风载以及车流量变化导致的动态载荷,使得鞍座两侧的主缆受到的力不平衡,从而引起主缆与鞍座间的动态接触和微滑移. 当不平衡力超过主缆与鞍座间的静摩擦力,主缆与鞍座间将发生滑动,将导致悬索桥结构失稳,甚至可能造成桥梁坍塌. 因此,揭示主缆和鞍座之间的动态接触和微滑移特性对增强主缆的抗滑性和确保大跨度悬索桥的稳定性至关重要. 本文作者运用自制试验平台,模拟悬索桥实际服役环境中动载工况下的主缆索股与鞍座间动态接触与微滑移行为,通过开展接触摩擦试验并对接触界面进行实时监测来研究接触摩擦机理揭示了典型工况下主缆索股与鞍座间的动态接触与微滑移机理(接触状态、微滑移幅值、摩擦系数以及接触压力等). 结果表明:主缆索股承受动态载荷时各个索股个体与鞍座间的接触状态存在差异,外层索股与鞍座间的接触面均为完全滑动状态,内层索股与鞍座间的接触状态为接近完全滑动状态的部分滑动状态,主缆索股整体承受较大动载时外层索股与鞍座间更容易发生完全滑动,索股间产生分层滑移现象,不同索股的微滑移幅值由内层到外层依次增大;随着加载力的增大,从内层索股至外层索股,滑移距离增长速率依次增大,从固定端到加载端索股不同接触位置的微滑移幅值逐渐增大;索股整体与鞍座间的摩擦系数呈快速增大-小幅波动并逐渐稳定的变化趋势,多根索股平均名义摩擦系数的平均值与索股整体与鞍座间的平均摩擦系数一致. 鞍座固定端接触压力呈缓慢增大-快速增大-缓慢减小-快速减小的变化趋势,加载端接触压力与交变载荷的变化趋势基本一致. 随着加载力增量的增大,固定端接触压力初始基本不变,然后缓慢增大,加载端接触压力增量呈线性增大趋势.

     

    Abstract: During the service of the suspension bridge, the time-varying load caused by the coupling of dead load, wind load and live load caused by vehicle passage causes the unbalanced force on both sides of the saddle of the main cable, resulting in dynamic contact and microslip between the main cable strand and the saddle. When the unbalanced force exceeds the limit friction force between the main cable and the saddle, the main cable and the saddle will slip. Then the suspension bridge structure instability and even collapse accidents. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the dynamic contact and microslip mechanism between the main cable strands and the saddle of the suspension bridge to improve the anti-sliding safety of the main cable and ensure the structural safety of the long-span multi-tower suspension bridge. In this study, a self-made test platform was used to simulate the dynamic contact and microslip behavior between the main cable strand and the saddle under dynamic load conditions in the actual service environment of the suspension bridge, and the dynamic contact and microslip mechanism (contact state, microslip amplitude, friction coefficient, contact pressure, etc.) between the main cable strand and the saddle under typical working condition were revealed, it was of great significance to ensure the service safety of suspension bridge. The results showed that there were differences in the contact states between each individual cable and saddle when the main cable was under dynamic load. The contact surface between the outer cable and the saddle was in a completely sliding state, while the contact between the inner cable and the saddle was in a partially sliding state close to the completely sliding state. when the main cable was subjected to a large dynamic load, it was easier for the outer cable and the saddle to slip completely, and the stratified slip phenomenon occured between the cable strands, and the microslip amplitudes of different cable strands increased from the inner to the outer layer. With the increase of loading force, from the inner cable to the outer cable, the growth rate of slip distance increased successively, and the microslip amplitude increased gradually from the fixed end to the loading end at different contact positions. The friction coefficient between the whole strand and the saddle increased rapidly, fluctuated slightly and became stable gradually. The average nominal friction coefficient of the cable strands was consistent with the average friction coefficient between the whole cable strand and the saddle. The contact pressure at the fixed end of the saddle showed a trend of slow increasing-rapid increasing-slow decreasing-rapid decrease, and the contact pressure at the loading end was basically the same as the alternating load. With the increase of the loading force increment, the contact pressure at the fixed end was basically unchanged at the beginning, and then increased slowly, while the contact pressure increment at the loading end increased linearly.

     

/

返回文章
返回