ISSN   1004-0595

CN  62-1224/O4

高级检索
杜士杰, 郭峰, 黄腾龙, 荆兆刚, 张树玲. DLC涂层对面接触油膜润滑影响的试验研究[J]. 摩擦学学报(中英文), 2024, 44(11): 1−12. doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023150
引用本文: 杜士杰, 郭峰, 黄腾龙, 荆兆刚, 张树玲. DLC涂层对面接触油膜润滑影响的试验研究[J]. 摩擦学学报(中英文), 2024, 44(11): 1−12. doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023150
DU Shijie, GUO Feng, HUANG Tenglong, JING Zhaogang, ZHANG Shuling. Experimental Study on the Effect of DLC Coating Inslider-on-Disc Oil Film Lubrication[J]. Tribology, 2024, 44(11): 1−12. doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023150
Citation: DU Shijie, GUO Feng, HUANG Tenglong, JING Zhaogang, ZHANG Shuling. Experimental Study on the Effect of DLC Coating Inslider-on-Disc Oil Film Lubrication[J]. Tribology, 2024, 44(11): 1−12. doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023150

DLC涂层对面接触油膜润滑影响的试验研究

Experimental Study on the Effect of DLC Coating Inslider-on-Disc Oil Film Lubrication

  • 摘要: 利用面接触润滑油膜测量系统,研究了固/液界面润湿性对流体动压润滑油膜膜厚和摩擦力的影响. 通过直流磁控溅射在钢滑块表面分别制备了3种DLC涂层(类金刚石涂层) (0 V偏压下表面沉积Ti/TiN/(Ti, N)-DLC/Ti-DLC/DLC涂层、−200 V偏压下表面沉积Ti/TiN/(Ti, N)-DLC/Ti-DLC/DLC涂层和−100 V偏压下表面沉积Ti/TiN/(Ti, N)-DLC涂层). 测量了不同速度下PAO基础油和同黏度甘油水溶液对原始钢滑块和3种涂层滑块产生的膜厚/摩擦力;同时测量了PAO基础油与甘油水溶液对4种滑块的接触角以及接触角滞后,并计算了相应的黏附功和势能垒. 结果显示原始钢滑块和3种DLC涂层滑块与不同润滑剂之间形成不同的固/液界面润湿性,润湿性强的界面产生高膜厚和高摩擦力. 界面黏附功和势能垒与多数膜厚和摩擦力的试验结果有很好相关性,但势能垒能更好反映界面润湿性对流体动压润滑的影响,载荷对固/液界面润湿性效应有一定影响. 本文试验中油膜无明显热效应发生,说明DLC涂层产生的不同界面润湿性可影响全膜润滑的膜厚和摩擦力.

     

    Abstract: The effects of solid/liquid interface wettability on the thickness and friction of hydrodynamic lubricant films were investigated using a slider bearing test rig, where hydrodynamic lubrication films were generated by a stationary slider with fixed inclination and a rotating glass disc. DLC coatings with various surface energies were prepared on the slider surface by varying the coating bias voltages and doping elements using the DC magnetron sputtering technique. Raman spectroscopy and contact angle measurements indicated that both decrease in bias voltage and increase in the doping elements could reduce the surface energy of the DLC coating. Ti/TiN/(Ti,N)−DLC/Ti−DLC/DLC coating was deposited on the slider surface at a bias voltage of 0 V (denoted as 4TDLC−1), Ti/TiN/(Ti,N)−DLC/Ti−DLC/DLC coating at a bias voltage of −200 V (denoted as 4TDLC−2), and Ti/TiN/(Ti,N)−DLC coating at a bias voltage of −100 V denoted as (Ti, N)−DLC. Using the original steel slider and the three coated sliders, film thickness and friction were measured with PAO base oil and aqueous glycerin solution of the same viscosity at various speeds and loads. The results showed that all the four sliders produced nearly the same film thickness and friction by PAO10. And when the lubricant was 93.5% glycerol aqueous solution, the 4TDLC−1 slider produced the largest film thickness and friction. The 4TDLC−2 slider and the original steel slider presented similar film thickness and friction. And the (Ti,N)−DLC slider gave the smallest film thickness and friction. At the same time, the contact angle and contact angle hysteresis of PAO base oil and glycerin aqueous solution respectively on the four sliders were also measured using a contact angle meter, and the corresponding adhesion work and potential energy barrier were calculated. It was found that the adhesion work of PAO10 to the four sliders was basically the same. And when the lubricant was 93.5% glycerol aqueous solution, its adhesion work to the 4TDLC−1 slider was the largest, and the adhesion work to (Ti,N)−DLC slider was the smallest, and the 4TDLC−2 slider and the original steel slider presented the similar adhesion work. The results showed that the film thickness and friction demonstrated close correlation to the adhesion work when one lubricant and various sliders were employed. However, when several lubricants and one slider were employed, for example, the film thickness and friction of four lubricants, PAO10/PAO20 and 89% glycerol aqueous solution/93.5% glycerol aqueous solution, on 4TDLC−2 slider were measured, and the adhesion work was inconsistent with the experimental results. Fortunately, it was found that in these cases the potential energy barrier presents good correlation to the film thickness and the friction. It was evident that the adhesion work was mainly determined by the surface tension and the contact angle. When the difference in the surface tension of the two lubricants was large, and the contact angle did not accurately reflect the interfacial wettability. Therefore, the potential energy barrier could reflect well the effect of the interfacial wettability on the film lubrication under the present test conditions. The test results showed that the load has some influence on the solid/liquid interface wettability. In addition, the experiments in the present study were carried out under conditions of low pressure and low sliding speed, which effectively suppressed the thermal effect, indicating that the difference in solid/liquid interfacial wettability play a dominating role in the film thickness and friction of full−film lubrication.

     

/

返回文章
返回