ISSN   1004-0595

CN  62-1224/O4

高级检索
何猛, 刘志远, 李双喜, 毕恩哲, 张江腾, 刘鑫宇. 基于流体动压原理的密封槽型优化方法[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2023, 43(11): 1254-1263. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023227
引用本文: 何猛, 刘志远, 李双喜, 毕恩哲, 张江腾, 刘鑫宇. 基于流体动压原理的密封槽型优化方法[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2023, 43(11): 1254-1263. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023227
HE Meng, LIU Zhiyuan, LI Shuangxi, BI Enzhe, ZHANG Jiangteng, LIU Xinyu. Optimization Method of Seal Groove Shape Based on Hydrodynamic Pressure Principle[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2023, 43(11): 1254-1263. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023227
Citation: HE Meng, LIU Zhiyuan, LI Shuangxi, BI Enzhe, ZHANG Jiangteng, LIU Xinyu. Optimization Method of Seal Groove Shape Based on Hydrodynamic Pressure Principle[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2023, 43(11): 1254-1263. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2023227

基于流体动压原理的密封槽型优化方法

Optimization Method of Seal Groove Shape Based on Hydrodynamic Pressure Principle

  • 摘要: 为得到螺旋槽动压密封最优槽型参数,进一步提高其流体润滑特性,基于流体动压原理提出以恒闭合力下典型参数螺旋槽密封参数为初始值,以动压密封螺旋槽的结构参数槽数、槽宽比、槽坝比以及螺旋角为变量,以泄漏率与开启力之比最小化为优化目标的槽型优化方法. 采用参数化建模方法,建立优化数学物理模型,得到一系列优化槽型,分析并讨论了新方法的优化机制,最后对两种优化槽型与初始槽型进行了分析对比,结果表明:对于不同转速和优化槽数,提出的优化方法具有较好的适用性,优化所得槽型集中表现为A、B两种结构参数,按螺旋角β、槽宽比γ1以及槽坝比γ2的顺序分别为15°、0.50以及0.55和22.5°、0.55以及0.55. 新方法的优化机制为:通过调整螺旋角、槽宽比和槽坝比,外移压力峰值和均化周向压力,同时,减少槽和坝区流体转移,降低流体出口流速,实现保持高开启力以及降低泄漏率的目标. 对典型螺旋槽和A、B槽型进行性能对比,结果表明:在小膜厚段,流体膜生成率均较大,因此高膜厚的典型螺旋槽为优选槽型,而在大膜厚段,泄漏率较低的B型槽为优选槽型,而A型槽在全膜厚段的表现介于二者之间.

     

    Abstract:
    Dynamic pressure seal is widely used in high-speed fluid machinery, and its groove shape is the key factor to determine its steady-state characteristics (such as opening force, film thickness and leakage rate) and dynamic characteristics (such as dynamic stiffness and dynamic damping), and a reasonable groove shape can greatly improve the fluid lubrication performance of the seal end face and ensure the safe and stable long-life operation of dynamic pressure seal. Therefore, the study of groove optimization accounts for a large part of the research on dynamic pressure seals. Groove optimization is mainly divided into amorphous groove research and fixed shape groove research, of which fixed shape optimization research accounts for a large part. This is because it is relatively easy to optimize the study of fixed shape groove patterns, and a large number of studies and experiences have shown that most of the engineering needs can be met by optimizing the widely used fixed shape groove patterns (such as logarithmic spiral grooves, T-shaped grooves, tree grooves, etc.).
    In order to improve the fluid lubrication performance of fixed shape dynamic pressure seal, an optimization method of dynamic pressure seal groove type based on the principle of fluid dynamic pressure was proposed: taken the typical parameters of spiral groove sealing performance under constant closure force as the initial value, the number of grooves, groove width ratio, groove dam ratio and spiral angle of dynamic pressure seal spiral groove as the optimization variables, and minimized the ratio of leakage rate to opening force as the optimization objective.
    Established a slot optimization model to obtain a series of optimized slot types, and the optimization results showed that the proposed optimization method had good stability for different rotational speeds and optimized number of slots, and the optimized slots were concentrated on two structural parameters A and B, which were 15°, 0.5, 0.55 and 22.5°, 0.55, 0.55 in the order of helix angle β, slot width ratio γ1 and slot dam ratio γ2, respectively; further comparison analysis showed that the inner mechanism of the slot optimization process was that by adjusting the helix angle, slot width ratio and slot dam ratio, shifting the peak pressure and homogenizing the circumferential pressure to achieve the goal of reducing the leakage rate by maintaining a high opening force while reducing the fluid transfer in the slot and dam area and lowering the fluid outlet flow rate.
    Compared the opening performance of typical spiral groove and A and B groove types, the results showed that in the small film thickness section, the fluid film formation rate was larger, so the typical spiral groove with high film thickness was the preferred groove type, while in the large film thickness section, the B groove with lower leakage rate was the preferred groove type, while the performance of A groove in the full film thickness section was between the two. It was noticeable that differences in performance between the optimized and typical grooves at different rotational speeds were indicative of the important influence of rotational speed on the optimized groove parameters. Obviously, for a given sealing parameter, optimization at the actual working speed could further improve the actual sealing performance. Meanwhile, the sealing performance of a typical spiral groove was not inferior to that of the new groove obtained from optimization, and it was wise to optimize the groove with typical parameters as the initial design for a spiral groove dynamic seal with a given optimization target.

     

/

返回文章
返回